What Is the Statute of Limitations for Slip and Fall Claims in California?
If you were injured in a slip-and-fall accident in California, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. This deadline comes from California Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 and applies to many premises liability claims involving negligent property owners, businesses, landlords, and other private parties.
However, two years is not the deadline in every case. Claims involving government property can require action in as little as six months, while certain circumstances involving minors, delayed discovery, or other legal issues may affect how the filing period is calculated.
Because missing the applicable statute of limitations can prevent you from recovering compensation altogether, it is important to determine your specific deadline as early as possible after a fall.
How Long Do You Have to File a Slip and Fall Lawsuit in California?
For most California slip and fall cases, the statute of limitations is:
Two years from the date of the injury.
California Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1 establishes a two-year deadline for an action involving injury to an individual caused by another person’s wrongful act or neglect.
A slip and fall claim generally falls within this rule because it is a type of premises liability claim. For example, if you slipped on an unmarked wet floor in a Fontana grocery store on October 1, 2026, you would generally need to file a lawsuit no later than October 1, 2028.
That does not mean you should wait nearly two years to begin investigating your claim.
Evidence in premises liability cases can disappear quickly. Surveillance footage may be deleted, hazardous conditions can be repaired, employees may leave, and witnesses may have difficulty remembering exactly what happened. Speaking with a Fontana slip and fall accident lawyer early can help preserve evidence while also ensuring that the applicable filing deadline is identified correctly.
California Slip and Fall Deadlines at a Glance
| Situation | General Deadline |
|---|---|
| Slip and fall against a private property owner or business | Generally 2 years from the injury |
| Injury involving a California public entity | Government claim may need to be presented within 6 months |
| Claim involving a minor | Statute may be tolled in some cases |
| Injury not reasonably discovered immediately | Discovery rules may potentially affect when the period begins |
| Special circumstances | Deadline depends on the specific facts and applicable law |
These are general guidelines rather than a substitute for determining the deadline in a specific case.
What Happens If You Miss California’s Two-Year Deadline?
If the statute of limitations expires before you file your lawsuit, the defendant can generally ask the court to dismiss the case as untimely.
That can mean losing your ability to recover compensation even if there is strong evidence that the property owner caused your injuries.
Potential damages in a California slip and fall claim may include:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Lost wages
- Reduced earning capacity
- Pain and suffering
- Rehabilitation expenses
- Other losses resulting from the injury
The statute of limitations concerns the deadline for filing a lawsuit, not simply reporting the accident to a property owner or submitting an insurance claim.
Negotiating with an insurance company does not necessarily protect your right to sue. If settlement discussions continue while the statute of limitations expires, you could potentially lose your right to pursue the case in court.
What If You Fell on Government Property?
Slip and fall cases involving a government entity are particularly important because the deadline can be much shorter.
Under California’s Government Claims Act, a person pursuing a personal injury claim against a California state or local public entity generally must first present an administrative claim to the appropriate government agency within six months after the claim accrues.
This may apply when an injury involves property controlled by a:
- City
- County
- State agency
- Public school district
- Public transportation agency
- Other California governmental entity
For example, a fall caused by a dangerous condition on certain city-owned property could potentially trigger the government claims process rather than the ordinary timeline that applies to a privately owned store.
If the government entity rejects the administrative claim, additional deadlines apply for filing a lawsuit.
Because these rules are different from ordinary premises liability cases, someone injured on public property should not assume that they have two full years to act.
Are There Exceptions to the Two-Year Statute of Limitations?
There are circumstances in which California law may pause, extend, or otherwise alter the usual limitations period. Whether an exception applies is highly dependent on the facts.
The Injured Person Is a Minor
California Code of Civil Procedure § 352 provides for tolling of certain statutes of limitations when the person entitled to bring the action was under the age of majority when the cause of action accrued.
In many personal injury cases involving a child, this can prevent the ordinary statute of limitations from running while the child is a minor.
However, there are important exceptions. Parents should not assume that every claim involving an injured child can safely be delayed until adulthood, especially when a public entity may be involved.
The Injury Was Not Immediately Discovered
California recognizes a discovery rule in some circumstances. Under that principle, a limitations period may begin when a plaintiff discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the facts giving rise to a claim rather than on the date of the underlying event.
For a typical slip and fall accident, however, the injury and its cause are often immediately apparent. The discovery rule should not be treated as an automatic extension simply because the full seriousness of an injury became clear later.
Other Tolling Rules May Apply
Other unusual circumstances can potentially affect a filing deadline. Statute of limitations questions are highly fact-specific, which is why it is important to have the dates and circumstances of the accident reviewed rather than assuming an exception applies.
Does Filing an Insurance Claim Stop the Statute of Limitations?
Generally, you should not assume that an insurance claim or settlement negotiations stop the statute of limitations from running.
Insurance companies may spend months investigating a premises liability claim. The adjuster may request:
- Medical records
- Medical bills
- Accident reports
- Photographs
- Witness statements
- Employment records
- Recorded statements
Meanwhile, the deadline to file a lawsuit may continue approaching.
Even if the insurer appears interested in settlement, an injured person should know the applicable statute of limitations independently of the insurance company’s timeline.
When Does the Clock Start After a Slip and Fall?
In a typical California slip and fall case, the two-year limitations period begins on the date the injury occurred.
Suppose you fall at a Fontana business on March 15, 2026, because water was allowed to accumulate on the floor. If the normal two-year statute applies, the lawsuit would generally need to be filed by March 15, 2028.
Calculating the deadline can become more complicated when there are questions about:
- Who owned or controlled the property
- Whether a government entity was responsible
- When an injury was reasonably discoverable
- Whether the injured person was a minor
- Whether multiple defendants are responsible
- Whether another statute or tolling provision applies
Identifying every potentially responsible party early is particularly important because different defendants can sometimes be subject to different procedural requirements.
Why You Should Not Wait Until the Statute of Limitations Is Close
The statute of limitations establishes the outside filing deadline. It is not a recommended timeline for investigating a slip and fall claim.
A premises liability case often depends on evidence showing both what dangerous condition caused the accident and what the property owner knew or should have known about that condition.
Important evidence can include:
- Surveillance footage
- Incident reports
- Inspection records
- Cleaning and maintenance logs
- Photographs of the hazard
- Employee statements
- Witness testimony
- Prior complaints involving the same condition
A business may routinely overwrite surveillance video after a relatively short period. A puddle can be cleaned. Broken flooring can be repaired. Employees and witnesses can forget details.
Beginning the investigation soon after the accident may therefore strengthen the claim even when the statutory deadline is still months or years away.
What Must Be Proven in a California Slip and Fall Claim?
Meeting the statute of limitations does not automatically establish liability.
A successful premises liability claim generally requires evidence that the defendant was legally responsible for the property, failed to use reasonable care under the circumstances, and caused the plaintiff’s injuries.
The central issue is often whether the property owner knew or reasonably should have known about the dangerous condition and had sufficient opportunity to address it.
Examples of potentially dangerous conditions include:
- Wet or slippery floors
- Uneven flooring
- Broken stairs
- Loose carpeting
- Poorly maintained walkways
- Inadequate lighting
- Debris in walking areas
- Missing or defective handrails
- Unmarked changes in elevation
Every slip and fall case depends on its own circumstances, including how the hazard developed, how long it existed, and what steps the property owner took to inspect or maintain the premises.
What Should I Do After a Slip and Fall in Fontana?
Protecting a potential claim begins well before the lawsuit is filed.
When possible after a fall, you should document the dangerous condition, report the incident to the property owner or manager, obtain contact information from witnesses, seek appropriate medical care, preserve clothing or footwear relevant to the accident, and keep copies of medical bills and other records.
You should also avoid assuming that an insurance company’s investigation protects your legal deadline.
If you were injured because of unsafe property conditions, a Fontana slip and fall accident attorney can investigate who may be responsible, preserve important evidence, evaluate your damages, and determine which statute of limitations applies to your case.
Speak With a Fontana Slip and Fall Accident Lawyer
If you were injured in a slip and fall in Fontana or elsewhere in Southern California, determining your filing deadline is only one part of protecting your claim.
Banner Attorneys can evaluate the circumstances surrounding the fall, determine who may be legally responsible, investigate whether the property owner had notice of the dangerous condition, and assess the deadlines that may apply to your case.
Waiting until the two-year deadline is approaching can make valuable evidence harder to obtain and, in cases involving public entities, the applicable deadline may arrive much sooner.
Contact Banner Attorneys to discuss your slip and fall claim and learn about the legal options that may be available based on your specific circumstances.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Statutes of limitations and government claim deadlines can vary based on the facts of a particular case. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Client Review
“I cannot say enough about Brian Banner and his law firm! He took such great care of us. I would highly recommend Brian and his law firm for anyone that has been in an accident.”
––Heather B., YELP REVIEW